Beast with the Lamb’s Horn.
15th century woodcut by Albrecht Dürer.
Louis Rubin goes into views many in the various Churches of God have about the identity of the "man of sin, the son of perdition" in 2 Thessalonians 2. He gives reasons he has heard that many think that this is the 'false prophet.' What about the popes referring to themselves at the 'vicars of Christ'? He brings up scriptures related to the false prophet, but also the King of the North of Daniel 11, the first and second beasts of Revelation 13, as well as other related matters. He ties Daniel 11 in with 2 Thessalonians 2. Is scripture fairly clear that the "man of sin" is NOT the "false prophet'?
A written article of related interest is available titled "Who is the Man of Sin of 2 Thessalonians 2?"
LATEST SERMONS
